www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/election_2008/2008/10/03/palin_f...
sent by
Fiore since 495 days 1 time 6 minutes, published about 494 days 18 hours 3 minutes
There were two key moments for me when Sarah Palin blew it badly. One was substantive, one was symbolic. The substantive was her bizarre statement about being happy that Dick Cheney had expanded the powers of the vice-presidency, and wanting to expand the powers more. Biden came back with a decisive: "Vice President Cheney has been the most dangerous vice president in American history," and he defended the existing limits on vice-presidential power. Point: Biden. Big time. The symbolic moment Palin flubbed was subjective, of course. But I instant-messaged a friend that she lost the debate when Biden choked up over losing his wife and child in a car accident in which his sons were critically injured -- and she went straight back into "John McCain is a maverick." I truly expected her to express human sympathy with Biden, and her failure to do so showed me something deeply wrong with her. But maybe that's just me.
comments
Did my fellow Americans see it the same way I did? I don't know. But I don't think they can have missed it.
Obviously she wasn't being chummy when she asked Biden's permission to address him in a more familiar manner. This was a setup so that she could later deliver her "say it ain't so, Joe" remark. As for the debate, 90% of the time she was on attack mode, the other ten she was babbling some prepared talking point. She didn't make any major mistakes, but she came across as mean-spirited, shallow and vacuous. I've seen these latter traits in most of the people (especially the females) who engage in competitions on reality shows (which is why I can only take 10 minutes - at the most - of watching these shows.) And it's not pretty.
She said the US is at pre surge troop levels when the truth is we are 27,000 above that number. Why was she given a pass?
Why is the $300 monthly US payment to Sons of Iraq and unsurgents not being cited as a major reason for "surge success"?
She got a pass for using a Civil War general's name for the general in Afghanistan.
Using Reagan's "there you go again" along with the set up "say it ain't so Joe" and "Joe Sixpack" was cute, but not much beyond cute. This is not a local race, but the VP- one heartbeat away from POTUS. She put on a decent show, but is out of her league for national office.
"And, (wink) wouldja believe it, youse guys , I' not wearin' any panties! (wink) (wink)
BTW, I understand that Giuliani has been asking for Palin's "hand me downs."!
Watch out America: A newly-minted Reagan with lipstick who likewise loves it when the red light of the TV camera goes on has been loosed in the land. At a spry 44, she is eyeing the top spot for 2012 following her current presentation to the public during her improbable campaign. Palin will be around for a long time, and our job must be to continue to discredit and dismantle her burgeoning political career. If McCain loses, Palin will inherit the mantle of the Republican party . . .
In the lap of your husband's business partner... it is all over the net... and all over his lap... SIN AND GOD SEES
What else----ANNOUNCING YOUR NEW ATTACK PLAN just when your TAX records have hit the stands... MILLIONAIRE 15% PAYER
What else--- NOBODY is fooled with the folksy fucked-a-moose stories you have... all you had were SMART GLASSES, then you had to spoil it all, by opening your mouth, AND SPEAKING
Tell the OLD WHITE GUY it's time to go home and take a nap, the nooner is off, you gotta get back to alaska and slop the kids