rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-news/theyre-not-going-to-lock-up-...
sent by
fontleroy since 495 days 13 hours 1 minute, published about 495 days 2 hours 57 minutes
“The next step would be for the full committee to take up the contempt recommendation,” Sanchez stated, “which I’ve been told by Chairman Conyers that he’s anxious to do, and from there it would go to the full House.” She added that she “would like to see Karl Rove held accountable for his complete disregard of the law.” (Bush Aid)Blakeman argued.“It’s a tremendous abuse of their power,” “They know that, and it’s exactly why they’re not going to execute on the contempt. They’re not going to lock Karl Rove up. … They want Karl Rove as a political pawn before a major election to embarrass the president.” Sekoff retorted “In United States vs. Nixon, they found that executive privilege is not absolute,” . “It applies to military and diplomatic situations, not to a thing where Karl Rove is trying to build a permanent majority with political trickery.”
comments
'RENDITION' HIM TO A PLACE IN THE U.S. UNDER CONYER'S SOLE & DIRECT CONTROL.
Letting ROVE roam FREE & UNPUNISHED just INVITES direct violence upon HIM - AS WELL AS BUSH, CHENEY, RUMSFELD, RICE, COWELL, FEITH, ADDISON, LIBBY & the rest of the BUSH CO-CONSPIRATORS. To do otherwise VIOLATES THE RULE OF LAW!
As for YOO, HE'S GOT TO GO TO PRISON FOR 'CONSPIRACY' AT THE VERY LEAST. He'd do well - as would all the above named - to discreetly remain in the U.S. rather than put himself at CONSTANT, IMMEDIATE RISK.
(PSSST...THAT MEANS BUSH AND ROVE ARE GAY.)