Finally, an apology from the National Geographic Channel

Remember, children, how we all watched two towers explode and were told that they actually collapsed due to fires and gravity? Well, that was before we knew that our leaders were outright LIARS, wasn't it? As Obama prepares to take us to war against Iran, we don't believe blatant lies anymore, do we? National Geographic's hit piece on 911 Truthers demonstrates two things: that the elites are desperate to defend their lies and that they know that truth is beating down the doors to the Kingdom of Lies. National Geographic apparently based its program on bogus pseudoscientific (Rube Goldberg) demonstrations, WITHOUT EVEN INTERVIEWING TO KEVIN RYAN, who could have told them about REAL scientific tests that ACTUALLY demonstrated that the official story about 911 couldn't have been right. "But we all know that “National Geographic” is different, right? Actually, some people are unaware that the NG Channel is majority controlled (67%) by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation.[5] The National Geographic Society, publisher of the well-known magazine, was a minority partner in creation of the NG Channel, but does not have editorial control over what is produced there. Instead, the News Corporation controls the programming much like it controls Fox News."
5 commentscategory: Abuse of Power/Corruption karma: 141

comments

  1. #1    It is amazing to me how we call these so-called people, "elites". My what dignity we bestow on anarchists. I can remember a time and place when the hangman's noose was the only thing good for these kinda of savages.
    written by Sparrows since 156 days 6 hours 56 minutesSparrows
  2. #2    A conspiracy this large would require that more than two people keep a secret, AND that Republicans are intelligent. Neither is possible in this or any other conceivable universe.
    written by godistwaddle since 155 days 23 hours 19 minutesgodistwaddle
  3. written by PHred42 since 155 days 20 hours 43 minutesPHred42
  4. #4    A few points:

    * Controlled Demolition, Inc. says they couldn't contemplate doing a building as big as the Twin Towers, and that preparing it for demolition would leave it too fragile and dangerous to be used as an active office building, and take weeks of preparation that would have been painfully obvious to onlookers.

    * The Twin Towers were an unusual design; fire weaking the steel girders around the outside could well have caused the collapse (no need for BS arguements about the temprature steel melta at).

    * The so-called "squibs" going off were windows being blown out by air pressure from the stories above collapsing (and WHY have them going off in sequence when it'd ma...

    » ver todo el comentario
    written by PereUbu since 155 days 19 hours 19 minutesPereUbu
  5. #5    So the fundamental lie is that NG is just an arm of NG magazine rather than another unlikely mouthpiece for Rupert Murdoch who is a Neocon and part Jewish, despite being from Australia.

    Amazing.
    written by MarkH since 155 days 11 hours 28 minutesMarkH
closed comments

who are we
code: license, download  |  images license
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional    Valid CSS!   [Valid RSS]